Zeiss SCAI Film Scanner
How we tested the Zeiss SCAI Scanner for use with EM negatives
Scan image of EM grid provided by Richard Henderson at 7um interval
OD range 0.1-1.4
linearity 0%
no color correction
monochrome mode
Zeiss proprietary lookup table (LUT) 
TLD2MRC or TIF2MRC to convert to MRC format
Ximdisp (or LABEL) to select area 512x512 pixels
FFTRANS to calculate fft of selected area
LABEL (option 5) to output intensities from fft
Ximdisp to display intensities
choose "average boxed densities"
draw box around each spot along x direction and around background near
each spot
same for y direction: 
Calculate integrated amplitude for each reflection
integrated amp = sqrt( (measureed avg intensity - bkg avg intensity)
* num of pixels)
e.g., in above image, 1 listed spot (1st order x direction) would be:
222.17 = sqrt( ( 57.72-0.59)*864)
Finally, calculate ratio of 2nd, 3rd, 4th order spots relative to 1st order
spot in both x and y direction
Values calculated at various times on various scanners all from copies
of this image
10/28/99 Our scanner immediately after installation
order lowerleft
lowerright
middle
x
y
x y
x y
1 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
2 0.384 0.415
0.375 0.407 0.379
0.410
3 0.0738 0.0964
0.0695 0.0911 0.0720
0.0943
4 0.0363 0.0335
0.0347 0.0310 0.0358
0.319
order upperleft
upperright
x
y
x y
1 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
2 0.383 0.417
0.371 0.405
3 0.0746 0.0987
0.0680 0.0910
4 0.0367 0.0356
0.0345 0.0360
9/28/99 Our scanner at factory (by Klaus Neumann)
order lowerleft
lowerright
middle
x
y
x y
x y
1 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
2 0.398 0.434
0.370 0.410 0.388
0.422
3 0.887 0.114
0.710 0.098 0.0816
0.107
4 0.0287 0.0282
0.0247 0.0250 0.0284
0.0290
order upperleft
upperright
x
y
x y
1 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
2 0.390 0.427
0.383 0.416
3 0.0831 0.108
0.0785 0.103
4 0.0281 0.0282
0.0251 0.0269
7/16/99 (from Klaus Neumann - 2 different focusses)
order scan001x scan001y scan002x
scan002y
(emgrid1)
(emgrid2)
1 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
2 0.40
0.436 0.31
0.333
3 0.086 0.114
0.040 0.054
4 0.025 0.026
0.015 0.017
7/22/99 (followup to Gordon Conf)
order lowerleft
lowerright
middle
x
y
x y
x y
1 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
2 0.396 0.428
0.387 0.428 0.380
0.412
3 0.086 0.111
0.080 0.110 0.0764
0.100
4 0.027 0.027
0.0277 0.0298 0.0258
0.0260
order upperleft
upperright
x
y
x y
1 1.0
1.0 1.0
1.0
2 0.397 0.426
0.398 0.432
3 0.086 0.110
0.0867 0.107
4 0.0262 0.0250
0.0278 0.0273
7/10/99 PDS1010GM (NYU) (same data as previously provided)
x
y
1 1.0
1.0
2 0.488
0.490
3 0.114
0.143
4 0.048
0.040
Acceptance criteria specified at time of the order:
An electron micrograph of a 400 mesh electron microscope grid
(provided by Richard Henderson will be scanned at a 7 um interval.
Scans of this image will be made in the center as well as at each
corner of the platten and equal quality will be expected at each of
these positions as detailed below.
A 512x512 pixel image will be Fourier transformed and the integrated
intensity of four "spots" will be determined both along two
orthogonal directions, after subtracting the local background (using
the "Average box densities" function in the program Ximdisp).
These
directions will be slightly askew to the scan axis to accomodate our
method for integrating the spot intensities (see attached Fourier
transform). The integrated amplitudes will be calculated as the
square root of these integrated intensities. Amplitudes will
be
normalized by dividing them by the amplitude of the 1st order spot.
The "standard" data will come from the flatbed, PMT-based scanner in
Cambridge made by Joyce-Loebl; this performs roughly the same as the
PDS 1010GM currently in my laboratory (data shown below).
We will require that the normalized amplitude for the 4th order spot
be at least 50% of that from the flat-bed scanner in both directions
and at all locations on the scanner platten (that is a normalized
amplitude of 0.020).
I would really like to convince you to make these scans at the
factory and to send them to me prior to shipment (e.g. by email) so
I
can verify the proper functioning of the instrument. This analysis
will only take me a couple of hours and could save you the expense
and me the inconvenience of replacing the optics (or the whole
instrument) after installation.
|